In the SK analysis of the neutrino events for [Fully Contained Events] and[Partially Contained Events] on their zenith angle distribution, it is assumedthat the zenith angle of the incident neutrino is the same as that of thedetected charged lepton. In the present paper, we examine the validity of [theSK assumption on the direction] of the incident neutrinos. Concretely speaking,we analyze muon-like events due to QEL. For the purpose, we develop [TimeSequential Monte Carlo Simulation] to extract the conclusion on the validity ofthe SK assumption. In our [Time Sequential Simulation], we simulate everyphysical process concerned as exactly as possible without any approximation. From the comparison between the zenith angle distributon of the emitted muonsunder [the SK assumption on the direction] and the corresponding one obtainedunder our [Time Sequential Simulation], it is concluded that the measurement ofthe direction of the incident neutrino for the neutrino events occurring insidethe detector in the SK analysis turns out to be unreliable, which holdsirrespective of the existence and/or non-existence of the neutrino oscillation.

在[完全包含事件]和[部分包含事件]中微子事件的天顶角分布的SK分析中，假设入射中微子的天顶角与检测到的带电轻子的天顶角相同。在本文中，我们检验了入射中微子的 [theSK 方向假设] 的有效性。具体来说，我们分析了由 QEL 引起的类介子事件。为此，我们开发了 [TimeSequential Monte Carlo Simulation] 来提取关于 SK 假设有效性的结论。在我们的 [时间序列模拟] 中，我们尽可能准确地模拟每个相关的物理过程，没有任何近似。从[方向的SK假设]下发射的μ子的天顶角分布与我们[时间序列模拟]下得到的对应的天顶角分布的比较，得出结论：对于发生在内部的中微子事件，测量入射中微子的方向SK 分析中的探测器被证明是不可靠的，无论中微子振荡的存在和/或不存在。