Reparametrization Invariance, the controversial extraction of $\alpha$ from $B\to\pi\pi$ and New Physics

Francisco J. Botella (Valencia U. & Valencia U.
IFIC)
Miguel Nebot (Lisbon
IST)

Miguel Nebot update to 2007-05-23

https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0174
The extraction of the weak phase $\alpha$ from $B\to\pi\pi$ decays has beencontroversial from a statistical point of view, as the frequentist vs. bayesianconfrontation shows. We analyse several relevant questions which have notdeserved full attention and pervade the extraction of $\alpha$.Reparametrization Invariance proves appropriate to understand those issues. Weshow that some Standard Model inspired parametrizations can be senseless orinadequate if they go beyond the minimal Gronau and London assumptions: thesingle weak phase $\alpha$ just in the $\Delta I=3/2$ amplitudes, the isospinrelations and experimental data. Beside those analyses, we extract $\alpha$through the use of several adequate parametrizations, showing that there is norelevant discrepancy between frequentist and bayesian results. The mostrelevant information, in terms of $\alpha$, is the exclusion of values around$\alpha\sim \pi/4$; this result is valid in the presence of arbitrary NewPhysics contributions to the $\Delta I=1/2$ piece.

journal: None

category: hep-ph hep-ex

Reparametrization Invariance,有争议的$\alpha$提取 从 $B\to\pi\pi$ 和新物理学

Francisco J. Botella (Valencia U. & Valencia U.
IFIC)
Miguel Nebot (Lisbon
IST)

Miguel Nebot update to 2007-05-23

https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0174
从统计的角度来看,从 $B\to\pi\pi$ 衰减中提取弱相 $\alpha$ 一直存在争议,正如频率论与贝叶斯对抗所显示的那样。我们分析了几个不值得充分关注的相关问题,并普遍存在于 $\alpha$ 的提取中。重新参数化不变性证明适合理解这些问题。我们表明,如果某些标准模型启发的参数化超出了最小格罗诺和伦敦假设,则它们可能是毫无意义的或不充分的:仅在 $\Delta I=3/2$ 振幅中的单个弱相 $\alpha$、同旋关系和实验数据。除了这些分析之外,我们通过使用几个适当的参数化来提取 $\alpha$,表明频率论和贝叶斯结果之间没有相关差异。最相关的信息,就$\alpha$而言,是排除$\alpha\sim\pi/4$附近的值;这个结果在存在对 $\Delta I=1/2$ 块的任意 NewPhysics 贡献的情况下是有效的。

期刊参考: None

category: hep-ph hep-ex